Legal Opinion

City of St. Louis v. Ranken

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1888PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Ciroibit Court. — Hon.. G-eorge W. Lubee, Judge. (1) Upon the question of damages or benefits done or accruing to real property by the opening or widening of streets expert testimony is competent. Eyermann v. Sheehan, 52 Mo. 221; Cantling v. Railroad, 54 Mo. 385 ; Hosher v. Railroad, 60 Mo. 303 ; Crow v. Peters, 63 Mo. 429; Tate "o.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis City Ciroibit Court. — Hon.. G-eorge W. Lubee, Judge. (1) Upon the question of damages or benefits done or accruing to real property by the opening or widening of streets expert testimony is competent. Eyermann v. Sheehan, 52 Mo. 221; Cantling v. Railroad, 54 Mo. 385 ; Hosher v. Railroad, 60 Mo. 303 ; Crow v. Peters, 63 Mo. 429; Tate "o. Railroad, 64 Mo. 149; Brown ®. Hubbard, 69 Mo. 305; Greemoell v. Crow, 73 Mo. 638; Appleby v. Brock, 76 Mo. 314; Branson v. Turner, 77' Mo. 489 ; City v. Hill, 80 Mo. 523 ; Railroad v. Calkins, 90 Mo. 538. (2) Where such testimony is…

1Opinion of the CourtRay, J.

This action is brought by the city of St. Louis, on a special tax bill, to recover the amount, which it is claimed the property of defendants has been benefited by the widening of Eighteenth street in said ©ity. No point is made on the pleadings. At the trial, the plaintiff introduced evidence to show the steps , taken by the city to secure the widening of Eighteenth street, for which this tax bill was issued, including the -ordinances providing therefor, and condemnation proceedings, entitled City v. Wall, report of the commissioners, and also the testimony of expert witnesses, to show that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Head v. HargraveSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. City of Kansas v. ButterfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. ThulSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  4. City of Kansas v. HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Oak Hill & Carondelet Railway Co. v. FowlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  2. State v. DarrahSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  3. City of St. Louis v. RankenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  4. Hoyberg v. HenskeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  5. Hull v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API