State v. Dean
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 116,568 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. MARQUEL D. DEAN, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. An appellant has the burden to furnish a record that affirmatively shows prejudicial error, and without such a record, an appellate court presumes the actions of the district court were proper. 2. A district court is not legally required to instruct the jury to view with caution the testimony of a noninformant witness who is testifying in exchange for benefits from the State. 3. To grant a motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence, a district…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- State v. Rojas-MarcelenoSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- State v. HaislipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
- State v. PeppersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- State v. LowerySupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. LevySupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
- State v. BermudezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
- State v. LilesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
- State v. DixonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2025
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.