Legal Opinion

Eisner v. Markovich

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 9, 1991No. Nos. 90-2851, 90-1858Published

1Per curiam

Jeffrey Eisner, the former husband, appeals an order approving the general master’s report. Cynthia Markovich, the former wife, appeals an order denying attorney’s fees.

We affirm the trial court’s order approving the general master’s report. The general master found that the former wife, who has primary residential custody of the children, should be permitted to move to California with the children and that the former husband’s visitation rights should be modified. The general master applied the test set forth in Hill v. Hill, 548 So.2d 705 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), review denied, 560 So.2d 233…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Standard Guar. Ins. Co. v. QuanstromSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  2. Hill v. HillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. Matilla v. MatillaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. Goldman v. SmargonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  5. Elenewski v. ElenewskiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API