Legal Opinion

Palladino v. Turner

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 7, 1972No. 42120PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon consideration of the petition for writ of mandamus, the brief of petitioner, and the return of the respondent, we conclude that the alternative writ should be discharged without prejudice. Petitioner *207may reapply for bail pending appeal in accord with the standards enunciated in Younghans v. State, 90 So.2d 308 (Fla.1956) and F.A.R. 6.15(b), 32 F.S.A.; however, on reapplication petitioner remains subject to existing statutory limitations on bail, including Fla.Stat. § 903.132, F.S.A., as may be applicable.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Younghans v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1956

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Bamber v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  3. State v. JimenezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987