Legal Opinion
Young v. . N.Y., L.E. W.R.R. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 6, 1887PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] This action was brought to recover damages for injuries received at a railroad crossing. The defendant's railroad passed east and west through the city of Binghamton, with two tracks, and Oak street passed north and south intersecting the railroad. The south track was used for eastward bound trains and the north for westward bound trains, and the space between the two tracks was about seven feet. The accident occurred about fifteen minutes after six o'clock,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cordell v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kirby v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Tucker v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Purdy v. New York Cent. & H. R. RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- Hooks v. New York Central RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1963
- Turck v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.