Legal Opinion
Holestine v. R.J. Donovan Correctional Facility
District Court, S.D. California
Decided July 23, 2020No. 3:18-cv-02094Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 ERNEST KELLY HOLESTINE, Case No.: 18-CV-2094-AJB(WVG) 14 Plaintiff, REPORT AND 15 v. RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 16 R.J. DONOVAN CORRECTIONAL DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE FACILITY et al., 17 AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR Defendants. LEAVE TO AMEND 18 19 [Doc. Nos. 49, and 52] 20 This action arises under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff Ernest Kelly Holestine, an 21 inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a Complaint claiming that RJ 22 Donovan Correctional Facility (“Donovan” or…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.