Miller v. Marchman
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Wyatt, Presiding Justice.
Upon the trial of this case, the propounder proved the execution of the will he offered for probate, it being stipulated that the testatrix was of sound and disposing mind and memory. The caveators did not undertake to prove that the alleged subsequent will specifically revoked the former will, but relied entirely upon proving that the subsequent will revoked the former by its inconsistent provisions. Caveators proved the execution of the subsequent will by the testimony of two subscribing witnesses, the third being dead. Both witnesses testified that they did not…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Driver v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
3Cited by1 opinion
- Harper v. HarperSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006