Legal Opinion
Alliance Pipeline L.P. v. 4.500 Acres of Land
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided November 21, 2012No. Case No. 4:12-cv-134PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND IMMEDIATE USE AND POSSESSION
DANIEL L. HOVLAND, District Judge.
Before the Court are Alliance Pipeline L.P.’s motions for (1) summary judgment, and (2) immediate use and possession filed on October 9, 2012. See Docket Nos. 3 and 7. Alliance Pipeline seeks partial summary judgment as to its right to condemn parcels of property named in this action to construct, operate, and maintain a natural gas pipeline pursuant to the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. § 717 et seq. The Defendants filed a joint brief in opposition to the motion for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. 93.970 Acres of LandSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Southern Natural Gas Co. v. Land, Cullman CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Tennessee Gas Pipeline v. 104 Acres in Prov. Cty.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 6.56 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. 16.907 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Jackson and Lawrence Counties, OhioDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 6.56 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. An Easement to Construct, Operate and Maintain a 42-Inch Gas Transmission Line Across Properties in the Counties of Nicholas, Greenbrier, Monroe, and Summers, West VirginiaDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2018