Legal Opinion

United States v. Greenfield Tap & Die Corporation

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided July 30, 1928No. 2917PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREWSTER, District Judge.

The United States brings this proceeding in equity to enforce its rights to collect the balance due on 1920 income and excess profits taxes from the respondent as transferee of all the assets of the Lincoln Twist Drill Company. The respondent has asked to have the bill dismissed, averring that section 280 of the Revenue Act of 1926 (26 USCA § 1069) provides an exclusive method of enforcing the liability, at law or in equity, of a transferee of property of the taxpayer. This statute, so far as material to the respondent’s motion, is as follows:

“Sec. 280(a). The amounts…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Billings v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Dollar Savings Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. United States v. AyerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1926
  4. United States ex rel. Harris v. DanielsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  5. United States v. UpdikeDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sablowsky v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
  2. United States v. CruikshankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
  3. Leighton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  4. United States v. Kouri-PerezDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API