Legal Opinion
Moran Scow Corporation v. SS BOSTON
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 2, 1972No. 68 Civ. 696PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION, FINDINGS OF FACT and CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
LEVET, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Moran Scow Corporation (“Moran”) and Tug M. Moran, Inc. (“Tug Moran”) institute this action against the above-named defendant-claimant S.S. Boston (“Boston”) and Mystic Steamship Corporation (“Mystic”), owner of the Boston, for alleged damages arising from a collision between the Boston and the Dump Scow Moran 106 occurring on December 27, 1967 near the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge.
To this complaint the Boston and Mystic interposed an answer and a counterclaim against said plaintiffs and the other impleaded…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- The New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- The Victory & the PlymothianSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- The UmbriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- The Albert DumoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Beeson v. Atlantic-Richfield Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1977
- Complaint of B.F.T. No. Two Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Clary Towing Co., Inc. v. Port Arthur Towing Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1973
- Pacific Bulk Carriers, Inc. v. M. v. Sadoharu MaruDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Harris v. NewmanDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.