Legal Opinion

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Shauna Bilecki and Scott Bilecki

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 18, 2016No. 4D14-1015 and 4D15-67PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevine, J.

The. issue presented in this foreclosure case is whether the bank was required to prove, in opposition to a motion for summary judgment, that it complied with conditions precedent where, the- homeowners did not produce timely, competent evidence in support of their motion for summary judgment. In other words, the issue is who has the burden to prove the absence of any genuine issue of fact when moving for summary judgment. We find that the trial court improperly placed the burden of proof on the bank to produce evidence in opposition to the motion for summary judgment when it properly rested…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Craven v. TRG-Boynton Beach, Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  2. Rodriguez v. Tri-Square Const., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Le v. Lighthouse Associates, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co. v. GinsbergDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. MARCO HUERTAS and MIOZOTI HUERTAS v. AVATAR PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022
  3. MAXZAK INC. v. WALGREEN CO.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021
  4. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, etc. v. HARLAN S. GINSBERGDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API