Legal Opinion
Continental Casualty Co. v. Duckson
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 15, 2011No. Case 11 C 459PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MORTON DENLOW, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs Continental Casualty Company, Chicago Insurance Company and Nautilus Insurance Company (“Insurers”), and Defendant Todd A. Duckson (“Duckson”) bring cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings to determine whether Insurers have a duty to defend, pay “claim expenses,” and/or indemnify Duckson in a pending Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) lawsuit under the terms of Lawyers Professional Liability Policy No. 198276838 (the “Policy”).
I. BACKGROUND FACTS
A. OVERVIEW
Duckson was employed as a partner in the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Northern Indiana Gun & Outdoor Shows, Inc. v. City of South Bend, Stephen Leucke, Brian R. Hedman, and Karl KingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Pisciotta v. Old National BancorpCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Lapham-Hickey Steel Corp. v. Protection Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. J.P. Morgan Securities LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- BCBSM, Inc. v. Walgreen Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
- Diamond Residential Mortgage Corporation v. Liberty Surplus Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
- United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. J.P. Morgan Securities LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017