Legal Opinion

Tajran v. Estate of Irene McDonald

District Court, S.D. California

Decided January 17, 2020No. 3:19-cv-01290Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIKE TAJRAN; DEENA TAJRAN, Case No. 19-cv-1290-BAS-KSC 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 12 PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO 13 v. REMAND (ECF No. 2) 14 ESTATE OF IRENE MCDONALD, Deceased; KEITH JOHNSON, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs Mike Tajran and Deena Tajran’s motion 18 to remand this action to state court. (ECF No. 2.) Defendants removed this matter 19 based on diversity jurisdiction under

28 U.S.C. §§ 1332

and 1441(b). (ECF No. 1.) 20 Plaintiffs argue remand is…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API