Legal Opinion
US EX REL. STINSON v. Prudential Ins.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 4, 1990No. Civ. A. No. 90-526Published
1Opinion of the Court
736 F.Supp. 614 (1990)
UNITED STATES ex rel. STINSON, LYONS, GERLIN & BUSTAMANTE, Plaintiff,
v.
The PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant.
Civ. A. No. 90-526.
United States District Court, D. New Jersey.
May 4, 1990.
Tracy E. Tomlin, Stinson, Lyons, Gerlin & Bustamante, Miami, Fla., for plaintiff.
William G. Kopit, Epstein, Becker & Green, Washington, D.C. and Robert E. Turtz, Epstein, Becker & Green, Princeton, N.J., for defendant.
OPINION
WOLIN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, the law firm of Stinson, Lyons, Gerlin & Bustamante ("the law firm"), has commenced this suit under the qui tam[1]…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gibbs v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Palmore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Stafford v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.