Legal Opinion

United States v. Yao

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 1, 2013No. Case No. CR-10-00434 RMWPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ANCILLARY PROCEEDING

ORDER GRANTING THE GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING THE COTE D’IVOIRE’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

[Re Docket Nos. 142, 144]

RONALD M. WHYTE, United States District Judge

This ancillary proceeding relates to $3,923,030 (“the funds”) which this court forfeited from defendants N’Guessan Yao (“Yao”) and Michael Barry Shor (“Shor”) in sentencing them for conspiracy to export arms illegally. The Republic of the Cote d’Ivoire (“Cote d’Ivoire”) asserts ownership of the funds and petitions the court pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(6) for a determination of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. The Republic of the Philippines v. Ferdinand E. MarcosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. In Re Alan Bernard, Linda Bernard, Debtors. Alan Bernard, Linda Bernard v. Clement Sheaffer, Mary SheafferCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. The SapphireSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  5. United States v. William C. FarrellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API