Whitehead v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
LEVY, Judge.
A defendant appeals the trial court’s sentencing order and also appeals the court’s determination that he should be sentenced as a habitual felony offender. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Appellant’s first contention on appeal is that the trial court committed reversible error by deviating, in its written sentencing order, from the oral pronouncement of sentence at the sentencing hearing. More specifically, the appellant asserts that the trial court properly sentenced the defendant, orally, to two five-year concurrent sentences for counts five and seven of the Information,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. RuckerSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Herrington v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Herrington v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Armstead v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Trueblood v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996