Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Beck v. City of Kansas City

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 28, 1939No. 34,209PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Daw'SON, C. J.:

The state filed quo warranto proceedings against Kansas City and its officials, challenging their right to exercise certain corporate powers in relation to the further industrial development of certain municipal property, earlier phases of which are already chronicled in our reports. (Kansas City v. Wyandotte County, 117 Kan. 141, 230 Pac. 79; State, ex rel., v. Kansas City, 140 Kan. 471, 37 P. 2d 18; Robertson v. Kansas City, 143 Kan. 726, 56 P. 2d 1032.)

The legal questions of present concern arose last November, and a prompt decision…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. City of Newton v. AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  2. Hines v. City of LeavenworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1865
  3. Wulf v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  4. City of Oswego v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  5. State ex rel. Smith v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1928

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. State ex rel. Fatzer v. Board of RegentsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  3. Genesis Health Club, Inc. v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  4. State Ex Rel. Ferguson v. City of PittsburgSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  5. Lewis v. City of South HutchinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API