Legal Opinion
Weinstock Hermanos and Cia Ltda. v. American Aniline and Extract Company, Inc. v. Grace Line, Inc.(third-Party Defendant)
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 7, 1969No. 17147_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Weinstock Hermanos and Cia. Ltda. (Weinstock), a manufacturer in Colombia, sued American Aniline and Extract Company, Inc. (Aniline) under the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act for damages, alleging that Aniline had sold it Ethylene Dimethacrylate which had polymerized and was unfit for use. Aniline impleaded the carrier, Grace Line, Inc. (Grace), as third-party defendant, asserting that it was responsible for the defects in the Ethylene Dimethacrylate. Grace pleaded the one year statute of limitations of the Act, 46 U.S.C. § 1303(6). The court below decided the issue in favor…
3Cited by4 opinions
- Allegheny Airlines, Inc., Third-Party v. Lee Lemay, as Administrator of Estate of Robert W. Carey, Deceased, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Aldy v. Valmet Paper MacHineryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Bendix Autolite Corporation v. Midwesco-Enterprises, Inc., Defendant-Third Party International Boiler Works Co., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Way v. WallachOhio Court of Appeals · 1972