Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Hubble v. Hubble

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, C. J.

This matter comes on now to be heard upon a motion to recall the mandate and strike therefrom the provision taxing the costs and disbursements against Deschutes County in the sum of $90.50. The cost bill was filed in this court January 21, 1929, having been served on Boss Farnham, District Attorney for Deschutes County, on the same day. The district attorney ignored the cost bill and the costs were thereupon taxed as a matter of course against the county under the assumption that, since the action was in the name of the State of Oregon, the county should pay the costs under the provisions of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. KeelenOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Eisen v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Gentry v. BeckerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  2. State Ex Rel. Bassett v. BassettOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State ex rel. Robertson v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API