Legal Opinion
National Recovery Systems v. Ornstein
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 3, 1982No. Civ. A. 80-1755PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
RAYMOND J. BRODERICK, District Judge.
Plaintiff National Recovery Systems (NRS), as the assignee of claims of the MGM Grand Hotel (MGM Grand) and Caesar’s Palace (Caesar’s) commenced this suit against pro se defendant Marvin Ornstein to recover the sum of $15,000 which the defendant borrowed from the MGM Grand and Caesar’s. The case was tried before the Court on May 3, 1982. For the reasons set forth below, the Court has determined that the obligation is unenforceable and will enter judgment in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff.
The basis for federal jurisdiction in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Virginia J. Barry Melville v. American Home Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Steaks Unlimited, Inc. v. Donna Deaner and Wtae-Tv4 and Hearst CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Flamingo Resort, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- J. E. Burke & Co. v. BuckNevada Supreme Court · 1909
- Craig v. HarrahNevada Supreme Court · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Airlines Reporting Corp. v. S AND N TRAVEL, INC.District Court, E.D. New York · 1994
- National Recovery Systems v. WonderNew York Supreme Court · 1983
- National Recovery Systems v. BryerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- National Recovery Systems v. FeltmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986