Legal Opinion

Gilliam v. Gilliam

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 21, 1960No. 5-2234PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.

From a decree granting her petition for separate maintenance and awarding Mrs. Gilliam $250 per month, Mr. Gilliam prosecutes this appeal and presents only two points:

“(I) The evidence of the plaintiff was insufficient to sustain a decree of separate maintenance upon her complaint.

‘ ‘ (II) The evidence on behalf of the defendant and cross-complainant was sufficient and should sustain a decree of divorce for him upon his cross-complaint. ’ ’

I. Is The Evidence Sufficient To Sustain The Decree Awarding Mrs. Gilliam Separate Maintenance? Mr. and Mrs. Gilliam…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  2. Kientz v. KientzSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  3. Shirey v. ShireySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  4. Harmon v. HarmonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  5. Hill v. RowlesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. WOMACK V. WOMACKSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  2. Cole v. ColeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  3. Gilliam v. GilliamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  4. Spencer v. SpencerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  5. Spencer v. SpencerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API