Gilliam v. Gilliam
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.
From a decree granting her petition for separate maintenance and awarding Mrs. Gilliam $250 per month, Mr. Gilliam prosecutes this appeal and presents only two points:
“(I) The evidence of the plaintiff was insufficient to sustain a decree of separate maintenance upon her complaint.
‘ ‘ (II) The evidence on behalf of the defendant and cross-complainant was sufficient and should sustain a decree of divorce for him upon his cross-complaint. ’ ’
I. Is The Evidence Sufficient To Sustain The Decree Awarding Mrs. Gilliam Separate Maintenance? Mr. and Mrs. Gilliam…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
- Kientz v. KientzSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Shirey v. ShireySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Harmon v. HarmonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Hill v. RowlesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- WOMACK V. WOMACKSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- Cole v. ColeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Gilliam v. GilliamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
- Spencer v. SpencerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- Spencer v. SpencerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982