Legal Opinion

Cook v. Continental Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 1, 1928No. 3 Div. 846Published

1Opinion

This is an action on a policy of fire insurance, whereby the defendant insured the plaintiff's building, referred to in the evidence as "Goree-Norris building," "against all direct loss or damage by fire, except as hereinafter provided, to an amount not exceeding forty-five hundred and no/100 Dollars."

The facts are conceded to be without dispute, and for the purposes in hand may be stated to be: On June 4, 1927, a fire originated in the business district of the city of Montgomery some distance from plaintiff's building, and fanned by a strong wind, before the explosion of a charge of dynamite…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bird v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Waters v. Merchants' Louisville InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  3. Lynn Gas & Electric Co. v. Meriden Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  4. Travelers' Ins. Co. v. PlasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Thompson v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API