Legal Opinion

In Re Oertling's Estate

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 26, 1948No. 17,653PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

Bowen, P. J.

I find myself unable to agree with the conclusion reached by the majority opinion.

The facts of this case present a situation in which an administratrix, appellant herein, is claiming certain personal property consisting of optometry business in Lawrenceburg, Indiana, and Cheviot, Ohio, and certain bank accounts amounting in value to approximately $20,000 which she asserts became her individual property by virtue of an alleged assignment made after the death of decedent by the appellee who together with the administratrix constituted the sole heirs of the…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shuee v. ShueeIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Knepper v. EggimanIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Brown v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Cornet v. GuedelhoeferIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
  5. In Re Oertling's EstateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Oertling's EstateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API