Legal Opinion

Drakulich v. Drakulich

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 21, 1984No. 02550PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

This appeal is from the dismissal of appellant’s petition to reduce support payments. Appellant argues that the changed circumstances justifying the sought for reduction were present in the form of an order of a Yugoslavian court compelling him to pay $600 a month support to his son and mother. The court below concluded that this order had been obtained by appellant for the fraudulent purpose of appearing to have greater financial obligations than he does, in fact, have. We do not review that conclusion directly. For even assuming, arguendo, that the Yugoslavian support order…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Banco Nacional De Cuba v. SabbatinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Somportex Limited v. Philadelphia Chewing Gum Corporation v. Brewster, Leeds & Co., Inc. And M. S. International, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  3. Melzer v. WitsbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth ex rel. Hauptfuhrer v. HauptfuhrerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Shuster v. ShusterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Findlay v. Findlay, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1996
  2. Scully v. Scully, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API