Legal Opinion

State v. Rose

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 8, 2011No. A-111 September Term 2009Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

19 A.3d 985 (2011)

206 N.J. 141

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

Zarik ROSE, Defendant-Appellant.

A-111 September Term 2009

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued January 4, 2011.

Decided June 8, 2011.

Susan Brody, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant (Yvonne Smith Segar, Public Defender, attorney).

Frank Muroski, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Paula T. Dow, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mr. Muroski, Robyn B. Mitchell, Deputy Attorney General, and Ashlea D. Thomas, Special Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and on the briefs).

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · LaVECCHIA; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. James L. McCoy Administrator of the Electrical Workers Trust Funds, Etc. v. Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  4. State v. CofieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  5. State v. GunbySupreme Court of Kansas · 2006

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API