State ex rel. Mayer v. Schuffenhauer
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
Each of the relators accepted the office to which he was appointed, and, having fully qualified, entered upon the official duties for the term of two years. This term had not expired when a single commissioner, with the consent of his associates, ordered the removals. The statutes, sec. 10.04, control this case. Under that section we find that none of these officials is to be removed from his position during his term except when he “shall, in the judgment of the board of election commissioners, be found not to possess the qualifications prescribed . . . or if any-inspector or *32ballot clerk in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McNolty v. Board of School DirectorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- State ex rel. Ballard v. GoodlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- Harris v. Joint School District Number SixWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- State ex rel. Ruemmele v. HaugenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by4 opinions
- State ex rel. Schroeder v. Board of School Directors of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Richard Teigen v. Wisconsin Elections CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
- Richard Teigen v. Wisconsin Elections CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1940