State v. Carroll
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
A jury convicted respondent of one count of lewdness with a minor. Thereafter, the district court granted respondent a new trial. The State of Nevada (the “State”) appealed, arguing that the district court abused its discretion in granting a new trial. We agree and reverse.
THE FACTS
In 1982, the State of Georgia convicted respondent of molesting a seven-year-old girl by fondling the child through her clothing. In April 1992, the State of Nevada charged respondent with two counts of lewdness upon a minor under the age of fourteen. In count I the State alleged that respondent fondled the…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- McCabe v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1982
- Haywood v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1991
4Cited by13 opinions
- Rippo v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. Mullin-CostonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- State v. Mullin-CostonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Carroll v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1995
- ALOTAIBI (MAZEN) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.