Legal Opinion

State v. Carroll

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1993No. 23614PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

A jury convicted respondent of one count of lewdness with a minor. Thereafter, the district court granted respondent a new trial. The State of Nevada (the “State”) appealed, arguing that the district court abused its discretion in granting a new trial. We agree and reverse.

THE FACTS

In 1982, the State of Georgia convicted respondent of molesting a seven-year-old girl by fondling the child through her clothing. In April 1992, the State of Nevada charged respondent with two counts of lewdness upon a minor under the age of fourteen. In count I the State alleged that respondent fondled the…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCabe v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Haywood v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1991

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rippo v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. Mullin-CostonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  3. State v. Mullin-CostonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  4. Carroll v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1995
  5. ALOTAIBI (MAZEN) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API