Legal Opinion

People v. Newberry

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1862PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from the Sixth Judicial District. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtField, C. J.

The defendant and one Adam Murray were indicted for murder; the latter as principal in the commission of the offense, and the former as accessory. The parties elected to be tried separately, and Murray was convicted of manslaughter. (Crim. Prac. Act, Sec. 367.) On the trial of Hewberry, Murray was offered as a witness, but upon objection of the District Attorney was excluded on the ground of incompetency. The record of the conviction of Murray was then introduced, and the discharge of the defendant moved on the ground that there could be no accessory to manslaughter; but the motion was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. BearssCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Garret v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1839
  3. People v. LabraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. YeagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Wandling v. StrawWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. In re CarlsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  5. People v. BlackwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API