Legal Opinion

Thomson v. Thomson, No. Fa93 031 12 20 S (Oct. 26, 1994)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided October 26, 1994No. FA93 031 12 20 SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FORSANCTIONS The defendant has moved for sanctions for plaintiff's failure to answer a question at her deposition held on July 18, 1994. The deposition was duly noticed. No protective order was sought by the plaintiff to preclude inquiry into any area of questioning. Pursuant to stipulation entered on the record at the commencement of the deposition, all objections except as to form were reserved until the time of trial. The deposition was noticed in accordance with § 243…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Monroe v. MonroeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  3. Billington v. BillingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. Pavlinko v. Yale-New Haven HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  5. Grayson v. GraysonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API