Legal Opinion
Robinson v. Artus
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided October 16, 2009No. 6:07-cr-06041PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION and ORDER
CHARLES J. SIRAGUSA, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court referred this 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus to United States Magistrate Judge Victor E. Bianchini for a report and recommendation. Judge Bianchini filed his Report and Recommendation in which he recommended that the Court deny Robinson’s petition. After being granted an enlargement of time, Robinson filed objections to the Report and Recommendation on March 27, 2009.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, this Court must make a de novo…
2Cases cited79 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chase v. LaMannaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2024
- McGruder v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, TennesseeDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2019
- Pellis v. Superintendent, Willard Drug Treatment FacilityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2022
- Williams v. ShanleyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2023