Legal Opinion

Ex parte Peaden

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 11, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

An application for a Writ of Prohibition.

1Per curiam

An application having been made for a rule to show cause why the Circuit Court should not be prohibited from taking testimony as to the truth of a sworn answer in a contempt proceeding specifically denying the alleged contempt, upon the ground that the denial under oath entitled the party to a discharge. It appears that the alleged contempt consists in the continued doing what lie was commanded not to- do by an injunction order issued by the Circuit Court as a, court of equity, therefore the application for a Writ of Prohibition is denied. See Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co., 221 U. S.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hill v. HearnSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. State Ex Rel. Hamilton v. TrammellSupreme Court of Florida · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API