Legal Opinion
Friedman v. 125 Division Realty, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 12, 1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In consolidated actions for specific performance of contracts for the sale of condominiums (Action Nos. 1 and 2) and, inter alia, for a permanent injunction barring the defendants in Action No. 3 from selling securities within the State of New York, the appeal is from (1) an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Spodek, J.), entered September 5, 1990, which, upon an order of the same court, dated March 7, 1990, striking the answers for failure to comply with a subpoena decus tecum, after an inquest, inter alia, granted certain of the plaintiffs in Action Nos. 1…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- De Sapio v. KohlmeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Sherrill v. Grayco Builders, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Scharlack v. Richmond Memorial HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Holtzman v. BeattyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Oak Beach Inn Corp. v. Babylon Beacon, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fraracci v. LasouskaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Figueroa v. Flatbush Women's Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997