State v. Harlan
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.
The defendants who are wholesale and used car dealers in Manchester, New Hampshire, were charged in multiple indictments with theft by deception. RSA 637:4. All defendants moved on various grounds to dismiss the indictments. With respect to defendants Harlan, McDermott, and Lussier, the motions were reserved and transferred without ruling in advance of trial (Loughlin, J.). Defendant Finucan’s motion was “granted conditioned upon consolidation and transfer without ruling” with the other cases. (Dunfey, J.)
Involved are twelve indictments naming defendant Harlan, ten naming defendant McDermott,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- In RE OLSEN v. DelmoreWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. EboliNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Louis R. Hutcherson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Bates v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. BussiereSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- State v. KilukSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- State v. JonesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- State v. BelknerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- State v. EtzweilerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.