Legal Opinion

LaFrance v. LaFrance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 26, 1995No. DR93-0485; CA A83121PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

Wife appeals and husband cross-appeals from a dissolution judgment. Both parties contend that the trial court erred in calculating wife’s spousal support award. We review de novo, ORS 19.125(3), and remand for entry of a modified judgment on appeal and affirm on cross-appeal.

At the time of trial, husband was 47 years old, and wife was 55 years old. The parties had been married 22 years. Husband was granted custody of the parties’ minor children.

Husband is employed at The Corvallis Clinic as a neurologist. His monthly income, which is derived from his salary and annual bonus, is $7,917.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. In re the Marriage of GrafCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. In re the Marriage of GoffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of PaganoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. In re the Marriage of DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. In re the Marriage of KrokerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API