Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Barnes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 27, 1994Published

1Dissent

Tom, J. (dissenting in part).

I disagree with the majority and would modify the judgment of the trial court.

In People v Ryan (82 NY2d 497), the Court of Appeals held that if a single mens rea is set forth in a criminal statute, it applies to all elements of the offense contained therein. Applying the foregoing to Penal Law § 220.18 (5) (criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree), the Court concluded that the weight of the controlled substance is not a strict liability element and, therefore, it is incumbent upon the People to prove that the defendant knowingly…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. ScarboroughNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. FavorNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. People v. RyanNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. People v. ReismanNew York Court of Appeals · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API