Legal Opinion

United States v. Taylor

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 28, 1993No. 92-2284PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

8 F.3d 1074

38 ERC 1381, 24 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,486

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,

Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Cross-Claimant-Appellee,

v.

Maurice M. TAYLOR, Sr., et al., Defendants,

Arthur R. Reibel and Ellsworth TDS, Inc.,

Defendants/Cross-Defendants, Appellants.

No. 92-2284.

United States Court of Appeals,

Sixth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 28, 1993.

Decided Oct. 28, 1993.

Jeremy M. Firestone, Office of Atty. Gen., Environmental Protection Div., Kathleen L. Cavanaugh (briefed), Office of Atty. Gen., State Affairs Div., Lansing, MI, for Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources.

Arthur R. Reibel,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Super Tire Engineering Co. v. McCorkleSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, Agricultural and Implement Workers of America v. Dana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  5. Swan View Coalition, Inc. v. TurnerDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  2. Leanne Walters v. Richard SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API