Legal Opinion
Dorris v. Gardner Zemke Co.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided June 2, 1988No. Nos. 87CA1447, 87CA1462PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STERNBERG, Judge.
William B. Dorris (claimant) seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) which denied his claim for a penalty pursuant to § 8-53-102(2), C.R.S. (1987» Cum.Supp.) from December 7, 1985, until November 5, 1986. Gardner Zemke Company and Maryland Casualty Company (Gardner) cross-appeal that portion of the Panel’s order which imposed a penalty pursuant to § 8-53-102(2) from October 5, 1984, until December 6, 1985. We affirm, but for reasons other than those given by the Panel. See Skinner v. Industrial Commission, 152 Colo. 97, 381 P.2d 253 (1963)…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smith v. Myron Stratton HomeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Skinner v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
- Hanson v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
- Public Service Co. of Colorado v. BoatwrightColorado Court of Appeals · 1987
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sundheim v. Board of Cty. Com'rs of Douglas Cty.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- Pacesetter Corp. v. CollettColorado Court of Appeals · 2001