Legal Opinion
People v. Llewellyn
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 5, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s contentions that he was deprived of his rights to a fair trial, to confrontation, to present a defense, and to the effective assistance of counsel are without merit. The trial court’s remarks and comments, and the curtailment of defense counsel’s questioning, were proper responses to defense counsel’s tactics (see People v Gonzalez, 38 NY2d 208, 210 [1975]; People v Barron, 309 AD2d 942, 943 [2003]; People v Serrano, 253 AD2d 531, 532 [1998]; People v Troy, 162 AD2d 744 [1990]).
Because the statements of an alleged eyewitness recorded in police reports and police notes lacked…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. StewartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. AlvarezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. TroyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. UpsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. LlewellynAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. UpsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013