Legal Opinion

Nikas v. United Const. Co.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 24, 1950PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwepston, J.

This appeal involves the rights and obligations of the respective owners of contiguous lots arising out of a party wall agreement.

Complainants, Nikas and wife, own a lot at the southwest corner of Main and Pontotoc Streets, Memphis, fronting 44 feet on Main and running 110 feet along Pontotoc, on which is situated a three-story brick building and basement formerly known as the Longinotti Hotel and now as the Manhattan.

Defendant Liberto and wife own the next lot to the south which fronts on Main Street 56 feet and runs back 110 feet west to the alley behind both properties.

The predecessors in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Knoxville v. GervinTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Walgreen Co. v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1932
  3. Prewitt v. BunchTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Lawman v. BarnettTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Macon v. SheppardTennessee Supreme Court · 1841

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Henderson v. LawrenceTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Harris v. Dobson-Tankard Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API