Legal Opinion

Al-Tom Investment, Inc. v. Director of Revenue

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided August 1, 1989No. 70829PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLIVER, Judge.

Appellants appeal the decision of the Administrative Hearing Commission, which held appellants liable for tax and interest for sales tax assessed by the Director on purchases of vegetable cooking oil. We have exclusive jurisdiction. Mo. Const, art. V, § 3. We reverse the decision of the Commissioner.

I

Kentucky Fried Chicken of Spanish Lake, Inc., Al-Tom Investment, Inc., doing business as Kentucky Fried Chicken, and Scott Marshall Enterprises, Inc., (appellants), are corporations licensed to do business in Missouri and have their principal places of business in Missouri. For…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Floyd Charcoal Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. State v. Southern Kraft CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  3. Asarco, Inc. v. McNeillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Becker Electric Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  5. Ex Parte Disco Aluminum Products Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Westwood Country Club v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  2. Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  3. Sipco, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  4. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  5. Jones v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API