Grigsby v. Liles
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
In accordance with the mandate given us by the Supreme Court of Alabama, we have carefully reviewed the action of the trial court in setting aside the agreed judgment and the granting of a new trial which subsequently became the basis for the petition of mandamus, and we find that such action did not constitute an abuse of discretion by the court or is plainly and palpably wrong.
Petition for mandamus denied.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- A. B. C. Truck Lines, Inc. v. KenemerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Ingalls Shipbuilding Corporation v. CahelaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Ex Parte GaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Ex Parte Perusini Const. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Ball v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.