Legal Opinion

Warder, Bushnell & Glessner Co. v. Arnold

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 13, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Assumpsit, for the value of goods destroyed by fire. Appeal from the County Court of McLean County; the Hon. Colostin D. Myers, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Harker

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is a suit in assumpsit by appellant to recover $406.35 for farm machinery which appellees were agents to sell for appellant and which was destroyed by fire while in the warehouse of appellees at Chenoa, Ills.

Appellees were dealers in hardware and farm machinery, selling on their own account and acting as agents for several manufacturing companies. They were special agents for appellant in territory adjacent to Chenoa to sell its binders, mowers, reapers and attachments, operating under a written and sealed contract dated…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Worrell v. ForsythIllinois Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stoneking v. LongAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908
  2. George J. Cooke Co. v. PisanoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API