Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
ARMOR CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES INC. v. BD. OF COUNTY COMM'RS OF OKLA. COUNTY
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 13, 2017No. 115,203Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Gurich, V.C. J.,
concurring in judgment:
¶ 1 Although I agree that Armor Correctional Health Services is entitled to judgment in the amount of $3,302,297.04 for medical services it provided to' 'the Oklahoma County Detention Center, I reach that conclusion for a different reason. Article 10, § 26 of the Oklahoma Constitution limits a county’s ability to .become indebted, and provides in relevant part that:. . .
[N]o county, .city,- town, township, school district, or other political: corporation, or subdivision, of the state, shall be allowed to become indebted, in any manner, or for any…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Smart v. Board of County Com'rs of Craig CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Protest of Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- City of Del City v. Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 114Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Boardman Co. v. Board of Com'rs, Ellis Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Baylis v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.