United Public Workers, AFSCME, Local 646 v. Yogi
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Concurrence
Concurring Opinion of
ACOBA, J.
I agree with Justice Ramil that Section 2 of Act 100, 1999 Haw. Sess. L. (Section 2), violates the core of Article XIII, Section 2 of the Hawaii Constitution, inasmuch as relevant history confirms that the right to organize and bargain collectively was to remain inviolate.1
I
As conceded by Plaintiffs at oral argument, Plaintiffs’ claim for injunctive relief has be*57come moot. From June 30, 1999, the effective date of Act 100, see 1999 Haw. Sess. L. Act 100, § 9, at 370, through August 4, 2000, the date the circuit court issued its injunction, no wage increases were…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Murphy v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Super Tire Engineering Co. v. McCorkleSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.