In re Hiroshi

The mother appeals from a decree by a judge of the Juvenile Court terminating her parental rights to her son, Hiroshi, and declining to order posttermination and postadoption visitation.3 She argues that several of the judge's findings of fact are clearly erroneous and that the judge failed to adequately consider positive evidence of her ability to parent Hiroshi. She also contends that the judge abused his discretion in rejecting her proposed placement plan for Hiroshi. We affirm.

Background. We summarize the relevant facts as set forth in the judge's decision and as supported by the…