Legal Opinion
John Donnelly & Sons v. Mallar
District Court, D. Maine
Decided July 11, 1978No. Civ. 77-284-SDPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GIGNOUX, District Judge.
In this action plaintiffs John Donnelly & Sons, National Advertising Company, and William S. Schaeffer challenge the constitutional validity of the recently enacted Maine Traveler Information Services Act, 23 M.R.S.A. §§ 1901-1925 (the “Maine Act” or the “Act”) and seek declaratory and injunctive relief against defendant Roger L. Mallar who, as Commissioner of Transportation for the State of Maine, is charged with enforcement of the Act.
The Act provides, inter alia, for the statewide elimination of off-premises, outdoor “billboard” advertising. 1…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- John Donnelly & Sons v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Stuckey's Stores, Inc. v. O'CheskeyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- Bossie v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.