Legal Opinion · Dissent

Crittenden v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 17, 1995No. 576-93Published

1DissentBaird, Judge

Believing judicial convenience should not be the controlling factor when determining whether the Texas Constitution provides greater protection than the United States Constitution, I dissent.1

I

A pretext arrest occurs when an individual is validly stopped or arrested for one offense only because law enforcement officials desire to investigate that individual for a different offense — i.e., an offense for which they do not have valid legal grounds to stop and arrest. Garcia v. State, 827 S.W.2d 937, 939-940 (Tex.Cr.App.1992).

In Black v. State, 739 S.W.2d 240 (Tex.Cr.App.1987), homicide…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API