Legal Opinion

In re Hagemeyer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 8, 1906PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Edward M. Grout and another, from an order of the .Supreme Court, made at the Queens County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Queens on the 9tlv day of December, 1905, granting a peremptory writ of mandamus. directing the appellants to receive a certain proportion of an assessment as in full payment thereof.

1Opinion of the Court

Jenks, J.:

The dispute is over the amount required to discharge an assessment for"a local improvement. The assessment was laid pursuant to chapter 644 of the Laws of 1893 which in part by section 7 directed that the assessors “ shall divide the assessment or amount imposed upon any lot or parcel of land into twenty equal parts or annual installments, and in each year thereafter, for twenty years, shall assess an amount equal to one of said annual installments, with interest, upon the lots or parcels of land benefited by said improvement.” The cause of the dispute is over the interest demanded…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sargent & Co. v. TuttleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  2. Dolan v. . Mayor, Etc.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  4. Scudder v. . Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. In re New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  2. Hunter v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  3. In re EytzingerNew York Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API