Legal Opinion

Huntington v. Chambers

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 21, 1884PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Coles county; the Hon. C. B. Smith, Judge, presiding.

1Per curiam

The declaration in this case is in assumpsit, containing the common counts only, for goods, wares and merchandise, sold by appellees to appellant and one John Fife, who are declared against as partners.

Appellant pleaded the general issue and the Statute of Limitations.

The evidence tended to show that the goods for which the suit was brought were purchased of appellees by Fife, and the only defense relied upon by appellant was that he was not a partner at the time of the purchase.

The plea did not put in issue the fact of the partnership averred in the declaration. That fact could only he put…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McKinney v. PeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Warren v. ChambersIllinois Supreme Court · 1850
  3. Shufeldt v. SeymourIllinois Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bensley v. BrockwayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API