Goldman v. Goldman

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

The lower eourt, agreeing with the master, granted a divorce on the charge of desertion. In the irreconcilable conflict between the testimony of the libellant and the respondent, the conclusion of the master who observed them is of value on the determining question of credibility., Fullwood v. Fulhoood, 156 Pa. Superior Ct. 409. Our judgment is that the testimony of the libellant, supported as it is by the circumstances, must be accepted notwithstanding the denials of respondent and the construction she would have us put on her conduct.

There is disparity in the ages of the…